How we define ourselves

I’ve been doing a lot of think­ing lately. Mostly about what it is that makes us who we are. As much as I know that who we are is made up by the inside parts of our­selves, our expe­ri­ences and so forth. I can’t help but think that my things start to rep­re­sent me, too. For instance, I’ve said before that I would feel like part­ing with a piece of myself if I were to give away any of my books. I felt devis­tated about the loss of my files. My writ­ing, mainly, is what set this off. I poured my heart into those works, they felt like a sig­nif­i­cant part of me.

But, like I told my hus­band. They’re files. They’re not even real things.

I still feel lost with­out them. Very much like a piece of me is missing.

I’d still be me with­out my books. I’d still be me with­out my old (and hon­estly not very good, although not bad for a 14 year old) writ­ing. Or, my kit­ten pic­tures of Max. My files are not me. My things are not me.

So then why do they feel so much like they are? Why do we have a need to per­son­al­ize every­thing? Things come in col­ors, can be embroi­dered, can have dif­fer­ent designs and styles. If our things don’t make us, why do we have to impose so much of our­selves, onto our things?

When I describe myself, the first two things I think of with­out fail is that I am a writer, and a reader. Secondly I list myself as a wife, and a cat-mom. I’m more than what I do, who I’m mar­ried to, and who I take care of.

But, what?

I think, at least in my case, our things become a shield. Our hob­bies become an easy way to con­nect with peo­ple with­out hav­ing to really con­nect or con­verse. If I say I love to read, and some­one I meet does too, that’s one thing we can talk about. That’s some­thing to start a friend­ship on.

If I said I was an extreme intro­vert who found talk­ing to peo­ple incred­i­bly intim­i­dat­ing and non-desirable, well, then that con­ver­sa­tion wouldn’t go quite as well.

Question to the read­ers: So, how do you define yourself?

6 thoughts on “How we define ourselves

  1. I have always thought, who we are, is how we treat oth­ers. Perhaps too, the fun and time you spend with your mate makes up more of who you are, than just hav­ing one. Someone you can be your­self with, helps you be you. :) What we con­tribute is what’s impor­tant I think. That can very much be related to our things. Especially book peo­ple. What you put in, con­tributes to what you put out. Artistic, com­puter, and other out­lets also make us who we are in my opin­ion. I know if I didn’t have a pool, or my tur­tle, I just wouldn’t be me. x| However I also wouldn’t be me with­out all my scars. Inside and out, what doesn’t kill you makes you… more you? :yay:

    • Hmm, that’s true, I think. What we chose to have mean­ing to us, shows a lit­tle about who we are.

  2. It’s very true that some­times we start defin­ing our­selves by the things around us instead of the things that we do or the things that make us what we are. We should be described with adjec­tives not nouns? Ha, it’s late at night and I’m get­ting lame.

    See, if you just asked me the ques­tion straight out with­out the blog post I would have started talk­ing about New Zealand and how I’m a math teacher and I like to take pic­tures… the list would go on.

    But those are things that I do and enjoy, not who I really am.

    I thrive on adven­ture, love, and hap­pi­ness. I like to be chal­lenged but I chal­lenge myself too much. I am very social and enjoy mak­ing friends. I like to give advice to peo­ple and I give it well but I also know when to listen.

    • It’s all very com­pli­cated, but it sounds like you have a pretty good han­dle on it. :)

  3. I think because we’re human we have a hard time con­nect­ing who we are to the abstract idea of per­son­al­ity, pur­pose and defin­ing our­selves. Having tan­gi­ble things helps relate the two, in a way that is eas­ily under­stood. It takes a lot to sep­a­rate your­self from that and real­ize that things don’t equal who you are. I think most of us will have those moments of clar­ity when we lose a piece of the tan­gi­ble iden­tity or fal­ter in our steps on the path we think we belong on. And just as quickly, many of us will snap back, like an elas­tic band, to defin­ing our­selves based on what we’ve phys­i­cally gath­ered from our expe­ri­ences. It’s the never end­ing human strug­gle. ;) But it’s impor­tant to rec­og­nize it in these moments of clar­ity, which you’ve done. The stages of loss apply to every­thing, even files that “don’t exist.”

    I define myself based on being clever and crav­ing adven­ture and by choos­ing to sur­round myself with amaz­ing, tal­ented peo­ple who chal­lenge me. I spent a lot of years being neg­a­tive and liv­ing a lack­lus­ter life, but I want to be remem­bered as being cheer­ful and dri­ven and end­lessly pas­sion­ate and curi­ous. So that’s what I’m work­ing toward, and I think I’m well on my way. :D

    • Yes. How we want peo­ple to remem­ber us, is another way of fig­ur­ing out who we are. I guess it’s what’s impor­tant to us?